Re: RFC2616 vs negative_ttl

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot_at_yahoo-inc.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 12:57:24 +1000

See also:
   http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1917

On 29/05/2008, at 12:31 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:

> http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2364
>
> The default setting of negative_ttl is an HTTP/1.1 violation. Do we
> have
> any good reasons not to make it default to zero (non-cached)?
> 

--
Mark Nottingham       mnot_at_yahoo-inc.com
Received on Thu May 29 2008 - 02:57:41 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Aug 05 2008 - 01:06:35 MDT