On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 14:38 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> > I don't think the zph patch belongs in 3.0.STABLE. It's a new feature
> > with several new directives, not a bugfix, and additionally I'd like a
> > bit of cleanup before release.
> >
> > Saw that it got merged to 3.0 some day ago... and I vote that it gets
> > backed out from 3.0. But should stay in trunk.
>
> I added it as a simple cross-port. Seeing as it's been well tested as a
> patch on 2.6. even if not integrated until recently.
>
> The polish was going to go in 3.1 when I have time.
>
> Any other votes for/against?
+/- 0 from me.
-Rob
-- GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue May 13 2008 - 12:00:04 MDT