Re: client_side and comm_close

> sön 2008-04-20 klockan 00:38 -0600 skrev Alex Rousskov:
>
>> This thread is (was) dedicated to the discussion whether _adjusting_
>> v3.1 roadmap to add client-side cleanup is a good idea.
>
> And I say no on that. The current code works kind of, and the small
> problems we have can be patched up for 3.1.STABLE.
>
> What is needed for the server component (client_side*) is a major
> cleanup of the server code + store + how it interacts with forwarding.
> It's a faily large change and beyond what we should aim for in 3.1. 3.2
> is more likely, maybe 3.3. Quite likely it needs a complete rebuild of
> the client_side* code (and rename to http_server), only reusing the
> parts that makes sense. It's not really that difficult job that code
> needs to do, but the way it's currently being done makes a big mess of
> it.
>
> client_side interactions with comm_close is just a tiny tiny part of
> that, and looking into that before we have defined how comm_close really
> should behave isn't meaningful imho.
>
> There is already sufficient amount of large changes in 3.2. Lets try not
> to make it a significantly bigger step in the evolution of Squid. Focus
> for 3.1 should now be to prune out bugs and look into what we need to do
> for 3.2.

+1. In case I haven't voted yet.

Amos
Received on Tue Apr 22 2008 - 12:57:36 MDT