I think at least a warning in cache.log would be good, so people are
aware of how often it happens, and can discover why a particular
request is a miss.
On 07/04/2008, at 6:52 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2008, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>
>> I didn't test 2.6 today, but I know from earlier that it falls back
>> on
>> miss on large response headers.
>>
>> Testing again to be sure and indeed it does. And not even a warning
>> in
>> cache.log about it..
>
> Cute. Ok. Can we now release Squid-2.7 ? :)
>
>
>
>
> Adrian
>
> --
> - Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial
> Squid Support -
> - $25/pm entry-level VPSes w/ capped bandwidth charges available in
> WA -
-- Mark Nottingham mnot@yahoo-inc.comReceived on Mon Apr 07 2008 - 16:05:39 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Apr 30 2008 - 12:00:07 MDT