On Mon, Apr 07, 2008, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> Running a test on 2.7 now to see how it actually behaves in the
> situation.. and it's fine. With the object in-memory is serves a cache
> hit, and with the object on disk we get a "swapin failure" and fallback
> on cache miss. Fully acceptable and not a regression (2.6 does the same
> thing, but in addition fails to forward the header proper as already
> mentioned).
You've tested 2.6 too? I read the code as handling a HIT but just not parsing
the reply and sending it back verbatim.
Adrian
-- - Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial Squid Support - - $25/pm entry-level VPSes w/ capped bandwidth charges available in WA -Received on Mon Apr 07 2008 - 02:07:49 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Apr 30 2008 - 12:00:07 MDT