Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> tis 2008-04-01 klockan 09:23 +1100 skrev Robert Collins:
>>> On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 20:43 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>>>> But I have to ask Robert how we best continue the merge process on
>>>> that
>>>> branch.. I suspect it would actually be best to recreate the branch as
>>>> a
>>>> new bzr branch from trunk, if it's kept at all...
>>> We can manually sync it up quite cleanly if we can determine the last
>>> revision of trunk merged to it; after that merges would be smooth.
>> >From what I can tell based on the CVS tags it last merged with revision
>> 8716 (cvs-1:serassio-20080302203406-x08yy0xwyogu864i) in
>> branches/SQUID_3_0
>>
>
> So whats with the branch SQUID_NT_3_0 already in bzr? as shown here:
>
> http://www.squid-cache.org/bzrview/
>
Never mind. Reading my email backwards is not a good idea. :-P
Amos
-- Please use Squid 2.6STABLE19 or 3.0STABLE3Received on Tue Apr 01 2008 - 00:32:30 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 13:00:10 MDT