Re: [squid-users] Caching files from Amazon S3

On Mon, Mar 17, 2008, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 14:04 +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > Annoyingly, why the hell is the request from the client a range request?
> > Squid can't easily cache those unless it somehow fetches the entire object
> > first.
>
> FWIW -3 has about 60% of the work needed to cache fragments done. Whats
> missing is a store that can handle them.

I've looked at the -3 stuff, and its missing about as much as the -2
stuff is missing. The memory store is only a small part of the overall
problem handling sparse objects.

(Unless there's some code I've missed that handles other range-request relevant
stuff.)

Adrian

-- 
- Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial Squid Support -
- $25/pm entry-level VPSes w/ capped bandwidth charges available in WA -