Hi,
At 11:34 21/02/2008, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>You catch my meaning exactly. Great.
>
>I'm thinking some basic criteria in a 2-minute thought process along the
>lines of:
>
>Did it exist in 2.6 before 3.0? 2.7 before 3.1?
> - No => probably ignore.
>
>Is it just a patch-and-tweak (not a lot of work)?
> - No => oh well
>
>Is it a big change to existing code (_new_ code gets past this)?
> - Yes => oh well goodbye.
>
>Is it worth a few minutes my time?
> - No => oh well, goodbye.
>
>** Okay, it _might_ be worth it. Spot-check core for vetos.
So, the next step is to define the list of the candidate
changeset/bug, and assign them to someone.
Regards
Guido
-
========================================================
Guido Serassio
Acme Consulting S.r.l. - Microsoft Certified Partner
Via Lucia Savarino, 1 10098 - Rivoli (TO) - ITALY
Tel. : +39.011.9530135 Fax. : +39.011.9781115
Email: guido.serassio@acmeconsulting.it
WWW: http://www.acmeconsulting.it/
Received on Thu Feb 21 2008 - 12:45:32 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sat Mar 01 2008 - 12:00:09 MST