Re: Time for squid 3.0 STABLE2 ?

From: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:49:10 -0700

On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 12:04 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> > What about to release squid 3.0 STABLE2 ?
> >
> > I think that there are many patches already applied to HEAD-3 that
> > could be applied also to SQUID_3_0.
> >
> > If needed, I could try to contribute in the back port of some patch.
> >
>
> I've been thinking along those lines myself for a while.
>
> Its a question of who does it, and which changesets. Whan I last looked at
> it I found a number that I could not confirm whether or not they were
> actually applicable to 3.0.
>
> There is also some small task of removing the back-ported changes from the
> 3-HEAD list of changes-since-3.0.
>
> I have some time now, if you like I can go through and pull up a list of
> those changesets I think should go in and the original author say
> yay/nay/backport-needed.

Please do! IMO, most of the bug fixes should go back to 3.0. New
features, including support for arbitrary request methods should not.

Thank you,

Alex.
Received on Wed Feb 20 2008 - 17:49:19 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sat Mar 01 2008 - 12:00:09 MST