Re: [squid-users] cache_peer weighting

From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:38:39 +0900

On Wed, Dec 19, 2007, Tony Dodd wrote:

> I've been running 2.6 for a while; and currently testing 2.HEAD &
> 3.0STABLE1 on two machines. I've dropped a bugzilla for this, along
> with a patch to modify the functionality to include http_port within the
> carp hashing code. It enables a squid config option of 'carp_hash_port
> on/off': http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2153

Ok cool. Now, the techie questions:

* according to the draft, the port isn't used as part of the hash, is this
  right?

* is just adding the port to the hash the "right way" of doing it?
  (its a hash, so you want to create even distributions..)

* do people have a problem with this going into squid, with relevant documentation
  being written about how CARP has been "extended" like this?

Adrian
Received on Tue Dec 18 2007 - 23:31:37 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Mon Dec 31 2007 - 12:00:03 MST