On Wed, Dec 19, 2007, Tony Dodd wrote:
> I've been running 2.6 for a while; and currently testing 2.HEAD &
> 3.0STABLE1 on two machines. I've dropped a bugzilla for this, along
> with a patch to modify the functionality to include http_port within the
> carp hashing code. It enables a squid config option of 'carp_hash_port
> on/off': http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2153
Ok cool. Now, the techie questions:
* according to the draft, the port isn't used as part of the hash, is this
right?
* is just adding the port to the hash the "right way" of doing it?
(its a hash, so you want to create even distributions..)
* do people have a problem with this going into squid, with relevant documentation
being written about how CARP has been "extended" like this?
Adrian
Received on Tue Dec 18 2007 - 23:31:37 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Mon Dec 31 2007 - 12:00:03 MST