>
> On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
>> Could you make that 'USE_ESI' instead? that seems to be a defacto
>> standard
>> within squid for enabling components. Easier to keep things consistent.
>
> I could make it USE_SQUID_ESI if you like.
>
> I'm still concerned that "USE_ESI" is too generic and likely to be
> chosen by some other project or operating system that uses an ESI
> acronym.
>
Seems slightly messier, but I see your point, and it will do.
Amos
Received on Thu Nov 15 2007 - 15:09:09 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sat Dec 01 2007 - 12:00:05 MST