On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 15:41 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 09:43 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >
> > That said, doing dynamic loading has GPL implications that I'm not
> > currently comfortable with.
> >
>
> What would those be?
The implications range from the "Module is a part of the GPL program
and, hence, must be GPLed!" FSF point of view to "there are no
implications except wasting time on discussing FSF FUD!" point of view.
Let's not waste our time talking about this here: We would not reach a
conclusion, and even if we do, it would not matter. There is an OSI
mailing list for such discussions...
Alex.
Received on Mon Sep 24 2007 - 09:50:03 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Mon Oct 01 2007 - 12:00:05 MDT