Re: Squid 3.0 bugs that need you.

Alex Rousskov wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I went through the remaining Squid3 non-enhancement bug reports
> targeted for 3.0. For most bugs, I was able to close or comment in the
> bugzilla. The following bugs are special because the questions did not
> seem appropriate for bugzilla. Please review.
>
> http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1345
> Bug 1345 - Problem with tar-file
>
> Squid3 needs a volunteer to remove cppunit from the distribution
> and, probably, from CVS. Anybody is willing to do that? This is
> a perfect work item for folks who hate C++ development as it
> should not require much C++ programming...
>

yay! this has been causing me some nightmares just thinking about it.
I'll get onto a purge this weekend unless there is anyone else who wants
to do it or veto it.
  Speak up within 8 hours or I'll create a 'nocpp' branch and get to work.

>
> http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1475
> Bug 1475 - File descriptor limit does work.
>
> I am not sure what the final resolution for this bug is. Henrik?
> Adrian?
>
>
> ESI bugs targeted for 3.0
> http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=951
> http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1088
>
> If nobody is willing to work on ESI now, I would like to bump
> any 3.0 target milestone for ESI to 3.1 because ESI is an
> optional feature. Any objections?
>
>
> Also, there are quite a few bugs targeted for 3.1 and bugs without a
> specific target. I reviewed the ones without a target for possible 3.0
> inclusion and updated some of the comments. If there is a Squid3 bug
> that is not targeted for 3.0 release, but you think it should, please
> flag it as such.
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Alex.
>
>
Received on Thu Apr 12 2007 - 17:05:58 MDT