tis 2007-02-06 klockan 00:30 +0100 skrev Michael Matusiak:
> I am wondering about that Etag/vary stuff... I could start with that
> 2.6 issue you mentioned (if-none-match), is it most recent version of
> 2.6 being affected? I will need to read rfc a bit again (I still
> remember getting through some parts of it was pain :P)
It was seen using the current Squid-2.6 sources.
1. object with ETag but not Vary cached.
2. plain GET request received after the object had expired.
3. The request forwarded to the server had If-Modified-Since, but no
If-None-Match.
Regards
Henrik
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Mar 01 2007 - 12:00:02 MST