Re: STL revisited

mån 2006-09-04 klockan 00:11 +0800 skrev Adrian Chadd:
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2006, Robert Collins wrote:
> > I'd like to raise the STL again as an option for squid3 rather than
> > NIH'ing a whole bunch of core infrastructure.
>
> Its cool. The STL looks nice. The really trippy thing will be:
>
> * will it affect performance?
> * how much will it cut the current codebase down by?
> * if they're at odds; which is more important?
>
> And:
>
> * can it wait for after -3? :)
>
> My suggestion is to wait until -3 is released, then create an "STL" SF
> branch and nut out the code to incorporate STL. We can then compare
> codebase clarity, performance and portability.

Same here, on all points above.

I say this is defenitely 3.1 material. Please don't do this in 3.0.

Regards
Henrik