Re: Tproxy patch

From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 15:57:11 +0800

On Wed, Jul 12, 2006, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> Redefining it like this isn't entirely safe as there may have been type
> declarations dependent on in in the included headers. But hopefully
> those where included by squid.h before it got redefined...
>
> Ah, there it is. We should be including sys/capability.h, not
> linux/capability.h. The sys header already have the needed glue to not
> collide with glibc. Fixed.

Cool, this fixes what some people have been telling me about
FD limits under Squid-2.6 being stuck at 1024. Good find!

Adrian
Received on Wed Jul 12 2006 - 01:56:19 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Aug 01 2006 - 12:00:02 MDT