Re: [VOTE] Squid-3.0.PRE4 release criteria

On Sat, 2006-05-06 at 18:07 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> I agree too. I think part of the reason behind squid-3 falling
> 'behind' has been all the cute stuff being done to it rather
> than concentrating on getting something stable. Get something
> stable, ship it out the door, then concentrate on more code
> base tidying.

This is my vote, too.

        Kinkie
Received on Mon May 08 2006 - 07:30:33 MDT