On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 14:39 -0600, Duane Wessels wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 30 Apr 2006, Robert Collins wrote:
>
> > Duane, how do you feel about me inlining the ICAP Makefile into the src
> > Makefile ? It makes it easier for automake to track dependencies,
> > particular when building individual files - less recursion etc.
>
> Um, I guess. I certainly don't have a strong enough opinion to stop it.
>
> Sometimes its nice to run make from a subdir and
> not have to worry about wasting time compiling other junk.
Yes, I can understand this. Assuming I do this, 'cd src && make
ICAP/libicap.a' will make just whats needed for libicap.a.
> In general I think the source tree needs more subdirs, but I care less
> about how the makefiles work.
I agree too - one for acls, one for the store, one for the event loop -
are currently in my consciousness
> So you also plan to do away with libicap.a?
Not at all. Libraries are great abstraction points for grouping
functionality. We can remove it if you want to, but I had not intention
of doing so.
Rob
-- GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 12:00:04 MDT