Re: so what is involved in calling squid-3.0 'stable'?

Hi Robert,

At 14.41 22/04/2006, Robert Collins wrote:

>Asking adrian on irc - '
>22:34 < adrian__> Enough people using it as a traditional forward cache
>22:34 < adrian__> and saying there aren't any strange problems
>22:34 < adrian__> Because its got a bad name
>'
>
>So, what is required. How can we engage the community in making squid-3
>stable ? There seems to be non-trivial interest in making it happen, but
>whats the actual benchmark ?

I think that the community should feel again that Squid 3 is not an
orphaned work.

So, for me, we should:

1) sync the 3.0 source tree with all the pending 2.5 changes/Bugs:
  - some are: 437, 454, 1089, 961, 1200, 1224, 1265, 1269, 500, 1402, 1355

2) check if still present or fix the majority of 3.0 specific bugs
- some are: 758, 1028, 885, 1125, 1155, 975, 1088, 1218, 1202, 772,
951, 801, 635, 1371, 942, 1499, 624

3) release a "Squid 3.0 community technology preview" (Like Microsoft
prereleases ) advertised to all the Squid community

4) using the community feedback, freeze features and step to PRE4

Regards

Guido

-
========================================================
Guido Serassio
Acme Consulting S.r.l. - Microsoft Certified Partner
Via Lucia Savarino, 1 10098 - Rivoli (TO) - ITALY
Tel. : +39.011.9530135 Fax. : +39.011.9781115
Email: guido.serassio@acmeconsulting.it
WWW: http://www.acmeconsulting.it/
Received on Sun Apr 23 2006 - 02:57:54 MDT