On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> I agree with Henrik here. We need something that works, and works now.
> A lot of the proposed 2.6 changes should go into squid-3 rather easily,
> including my IO stuff.
Everything except your IO stuff is in squid-3 already to a large extent.
(the SSL code is only halfway there, first generation in squid-3, second
generation on it's way)
> Heck, I'd like to do some work on COSS which could be easily ported to
> work with squid-3 but I can't guarantee that squid-3 is
> stable/predictable enough to know whether its squid-3, or my COSS code.
Isn't the COSS code in squid-3 quite far ahead of Squid-2 already?
Regards
Henrik
Received on Mon Nov 07 2005 - 03:00:30 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 12:00:15 MST