Re: How squid caches some things

On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 11:22:53 +0200 (CEST)
  Henrik Nordstrom <hno@squid-cache.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Evgeny Kotsuba wrote:
>
>> And were is logic ?
>> requesting client said that Squid MUST NOT use a cached copy
>
> Which is why there was not a cache hit. The client request forbits
>this being a cache hit, redirected or not.
>
>> Squid config said that Squid MUST REDIRECT this URL
>
> Yes?
>
>> If we must do as requesting client said, than why we ever
>>redirect it ?
>
> I don't get what you see as a conflict.
>
>
> If you see that the redirection did not happen then there is a
>problem. But the reason why this was not a cache hit is because the
>client explicitly forbids the cache to be used to server this
>request.
>
You say as real communist if change "client" to "communist party" in
"client explicitly forbids" ;-)
Well. If "client explicitly forbids the cache to be used to server
this request." then why we have TCP_REFRESH_HIT for this request ?

SY,
Evgeny Kotsuba
Received on Fri Oct 14 2005 - 06:33:16 MDT