Re: Date cached:

Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

>
>
>In accelerators the situation is more dim as the RFC does not apply to
>accelerators, only your own definitions of what the accelerator should
>do... It is perfectly fine (RFC wise) for an accelerator to substitute
>it's own HTTP headers to any level desired.
>
>

How bad would it be to just drop the data header in this case? The RFC
seems to allow for this.

This is why I ask, see:

http://www.ircache.net/cgi-bin/cacheability.py?query=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F&descend=on

(i.a.cnn.net and i.cnn.net are Squid)

-- 
Brian Akins
Senior Systems Engineer
CNN Internet Technologies