Hi,
On Sun, 25 May 2003 22:47:28 +0200
Henrik Nordstrom <hno@marasystems.com> wrote:
>On Sunday 25 May 2003 19.52, Evgeny Kotsuba wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> It seems that last change in src\HttpHeader.c httpHeaderReset()
>> is not very good.
>>
>> Was:
>> ================================
>> int
>> httpHeaderReset(HttpHeader * hdr)
>> {
>> http_hdr_owner_type ho;
>> assert(hdr);
>> ho = hdr->owner;
>> ==================================
>> Now:
>> int
>> httpHeaderReset(HttpHeader * hdr)
>> {
>> http_hdr_owner_type ho = hdr->owner;
>> assert(hdr);
>> ho = hdr->owner;
>> ==================================
>
>
>While your code is what it should look like, this is nothing new. The
>code has lookes as "Was" above since the http_hdr_owner_type was
>introduced (27 May 1998).
I don't understood what you wrote about :-/
I see only bad change in 2.5s3 vs 2.5s2(or s1?)
http_hdr_owner_type
ho = hdr->owner;
assert(hdr);
ho = hdr->owner;
If hdr is NULL, then what will be in first ho = ?
And why double code for initialization of variable ho is better ?
SY,
Evgeny Kotsuba
___________________
Посмотрел "Матрицу-2" - не понравилось, зато поднял 40% на акциях РАО ЕЭС:
http://www.rambler.ru/nettrader/
Received on Mon May 26 2003 - 02:05:30 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:19:57 MST