Please open two bug reports.
1. A bug report with the assertion error, and a backtrace of where it 
happens.
2. A bug report with the warnings.
Regards
Henrik
On Sun, 25 May 2003, GV wrote:
> Hello Henrik,
> 
> Thanks for your response. Looks like the problem is more than what I thought
> off. Please see the details below.
> 
> I fixed all the warnings, most of them are from debug statements and just
> commented them out. Other warnings and fixes are as follows...
> 
> 1. "HttpReply.cc" - typecast to ssize_t solves this warning
> 
> 161     size_t s = XMIN(end + 1, (ssize_t)4096);
>                                                    ^^^^^^^
> HttpReply.cc: In function `int httpReplyParse (HttpReply *, const char *,
> long int)':
> HttpReply.cc:161: no matching function for call to `min (long int, int)'
> 
> 2.  "mem.cc" - %d to %ld
> 
> cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
> mem.cc: In function `void memBufStats (StoreEntry *)':
> mem.cc:125: warning: int format, different type arg (arg 3)
> mem.cc:125: warning: int format, different type arg (arg 4)
> mem.cc: In function `void Mem::PoolReport (const MemPoolStats *, const
> MemPoolMeter *, StoreEntry *)':
> mem.cc:622: warning: int format, different type arg (arg 4)
> mem.cc:622: warning: int format, different type arg (arg 5)
> mem.cc:622: warning: int format, different type arg (arg 9)
> mem.cc:622: warning: int format, different type arg (arg 10)
> mem.cc:622: warning: int format, different type arg (arg 13)
> mem.cc:622: warning: int format, different type arg (arg 14)
> 
> storeAppendPrintf(sentry, "Large buffers: %ld (%ld KB)\n",
>     124                       HugeBufCountMeter.level,
>     125                       HugeBufVolumeMeter.level / 1024);
> 
>     598     storeAppendPrintf(e,
>     599                       "%d\t %ld\t %ld\t %.2f\t %.1f\t"  /* alloc */
>     600                       "%d\t %ld\t %ld\t %.1f\t" /* in use */
>     601                       "%d\t %ld\t %ld\t"        /* idle */
>     602                       "%.0f\t %.1f\t %.1f\t %.1f\n",    /* saved */
>     603                       /* alloc */
>     604                       mp_st->items_alloc,
> 
> 3.  "stat.c" - %6d to %6ld
> 
> cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
> stat.cc: In function `void info_get (StoreEntry *)':
> stat.cc:691: warning: int format, different type arg (arg 3)
> stat.cc:693: warning: int format, different type arg (arg 3)
> 
>     690         storeAppendPrintf(sentry, "\tmemPool accounted:     %6ld KB
> %3d%%\n",
>     691                           mp_stats.TheMeter->alloc.level >> 10,
> percent(mp_stats.TheMet        er->alloc.level, t));
>     692         storeAppendPrintf(sentry, "\tmemPool unaccounted:   %6ld KB
> %3d%%\n",
>     693                           (t - mp_stats.TheMeter->alloc.level) >>
> 10, percent((t - mp_s        tats.TheMeter->alloc.level), t));
> 
> > > Finally, I am NOT quite happy about the hack I did, but works fine.
> > > I did some quick testing with my netscape. Looks better except the
> > > above log messages. May be I should fix all the warnings, instead
> > > of removing "-Werror" flag from the compilation. If I come up with
> > > some changes to make the above issue vanished, will the changes be
> > > acceptable to go into CVS?
> >
> > The warnings should be fixed.
> 
> Please see the above details. As I stated already, other warnings are from
> debug statements. I can send them, if you need.
> 
> But this[Warning fixes] does NOT solve the runtime issue, I have reported
> earlier. Still, the assertion is getting failed in the same location.
> 
> 2003/05/25 16:44:08| Starting Squid Cache version 3.0.DEVEL-20030524 for
> ia64-unknown-linux-gnu...
> 2003/05/25 16:44:08| assertion failed: mem.cc:230: "size ==
> StrPoolsAttrs[i].obj_size"
> Aborted
> 
> Any help will be much appreciated to proceed further.
> 
> > > Another weired thing I have seen is, regardless of the value I have
> > > set for "mem_pools" "on" or "off", I always have seen "mem_pools
> > > are off" in the log file as follows. I am NOT quite sure about
> > > this, just wanted to know, if there is a known issue...
> > > Log info : Memory pools are 'off'; limit: 0.00 MB
> >
> > And you did not request to have the pools disabled when you built your
> > Squid? (--disable-mempools)
> 
> I have used only default option with my own prefix. By default, mempools
> should be on, I guess.
> 
> Regards
> GV
> 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> www.ViSolve.net - The Open Source Solutions Provider
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> 
Received on Mon May 26 2003 - 00:33:24 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:19:57 MST