Re: C++ ready

On Sun, 2002-10-13 at 21:41, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On Sunday 13 October 2002 04.57, Robert Collins wrote:
>
> > IMO no - there is a *LOT* of code not changing. lib/* hasn't been
> > touched as yet (given that it's already quite well separated out, I
> > saw no immediate benefit or need there). snmplib/* likewise.
> > helpers/* hasn't been touched, and thats something like 30-40% of
> > our code.
>
> I am of the opinion that a separate repository is the only way to go
> here.. Having a CVS repository where >50% of the code is in Attic is
> not a very healty thing, and I'd like to keep history and diff
> capabilities where possible..
>
> So as Adrian, I propose a new CVS repository being set up for the "C++
> version". I can provide syncronisation between the two where/if
> needed.

Fine by me, I'm not concerned either way.

Rob