Re: icp bitrot?

From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 01:22:34 -0600

On Wed, Oct 09, 2002, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 07:54, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> > Duane Wessels wrote:
> >
> > > > Actually, I'm creating async storeGetPublic* functions. This requires
> > > > breaking every synchronous function that use storeGetPublic up into a
> > > > start and completion routine. ICP uses storeGetPublic...
> > >
> > > What will this do to ICP performance?

Bad things, but once its stable I'd expect to implement a "reply caching"
layer between the storefs and the store layer which should fix
popular objects.

Yes, it depends quite a lot on the implementation of the filesystem.

> I've been doing it my cxx test branch, experimenting with how callback
> APIs might look.
>
> It's currently implemented by simply calling the synchronous
> storeGetPublic, and then calling back with the result.
>
> The main point is to get the API change from sync to callback
> implemented and tested.

.. and convert stuff to C++. Cute. :)

Adrian
Received on Wed Oct 09 2002 - 01:22:35 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:16:54 MST