Andres Kroonmaa wrote:
> Yes, which leads to error that accounted time is either equal or less
> than actual. In recursive case there is no other possibility, is it?
> Each successive STOP should count more time than previous STOP, from
> its peering START, but counts only from last START.
> (((((..))))) -> (..)))))
> It has to count time for each STOP anyway, for each invocation of func.
It is all a matter of how you perceive a measurement probe.. do you see it as
a single probe that can be triggered more than one, or one probe per trigger
instance.
Regards
Henrik
Received on Wed Oct 02 2002 - 05:41:39 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:16:51 MST