On Mon, Sep 09, 2002, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> Robert Collins wrote:
>
> > Hmm. I think it'd be better to get the 2.6 slated code done asap -
> > reinstating range being the big thing - and branch 2.6. Otherwise, we
> > will endup on the slippery slope of where to stop improving again :}.
>
> Agreed.
>
> > Once we've gotten the 2.6 slated stuff out of the way, and 2.6 branched,
> > then I'm very much for refactoring like mad.
>
> Same here. We can't go on patching up the current client<->store<->server mess
> much beyond 2.6, but if we attempt to refactor the relations before 2.6 then
> the 2.6 release won't be seen for very long I am afraid..
>
Good. We're all in agreement for taking large {sharp,blunt} objects to the
client/server/store code. Nice.
Ta.
Adrian
Received on Mon Sep 09 2002 - 22:40:46 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:16:31 MST