RE: Squid-2.5.STABLE?

From: Henrik Nordström <hno@dont-contact.us>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 10:23:34 +0200 (CEST)

On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Chemolli Francesco (USI) wrote:

> Chatting with Andrew Bartlett, it might be a case of NTLMv2
> incorrectly creeping in. Our NTLMSSP capabilities negotiation
> is not perfect, I think.

Quite likely (NTLMv2). Our NTLMSSP capabilities negotiation is
non-existent I would say.. the squid<->helper protocol is flawed. See
prior discussion regarding NTLMv2.

> > You didn't by any chance capture the challenge/response packet of a
> > failing session so we can take a closer look at it to see if the
> > problem cause can be identified?
>
> It seems I haven't, unfortunately. "Smart script" dumbness.

Ok. Then we can only speculate on what the problem may be, and the most
likely thread is a client trying to use NTLMv2.

Regards
Henrik
Received on Fri Sep 06 2002 - 02:23:36 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:16:27 MST