On Tuesday 03 September 2002 10.35, Robert Collins wrote:
> I think that any binary 'we' produce should be packaged with
> free-as-in-speech tools. Last I heard there is no open source MSI
> installer service - but there are plenty of open source
> install-from-the-web programs.
My opinion is that how Squid is packaged is up to the person making
the distribution. I have no problem with someone using the MSI
installer for packaging Squid as long as the MSI license allows for
this..
If there will be an official (as opposed to contributed) Squid for NT
binary distribution distributed next to the official source then my
view is somewhat different. Such binary should if possible be build
with all free tools.
Regards
Henrik
Received on Tue Sep 03 2002 - 03:42:27 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:16:25 MST