On Sun, Aug 11, 2002, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> Looks fine until we get around to fix buffer management proper. Why
> didn't I think of this when looking at this the first time??? When
> looking at this problem I thought there needed to be yet another
> buffer..
yeah, it took me a few minutes to figure out what I was doing wrong.. :)
> Ah.. I was confused on the variable "http"... the buffer is belonging
> to the request, not the client connection. Have been bitten by this
> variable name several times always thinking it is a "http"
> connection, not a individual request/response message..
Yup. The code is really trippily messy in places.
Its hard at the moment to make it unmessy. :-)
Adrian
Received on Sun Aug 11 2002 - 01:45:31 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:16:03 MST