On Friday 21 June 2002 22.56, Jeffrey D. Wheelhouse wrote:
> Hopefully rproxy will pick this up the next time the gap is closed
> between it and head.
Sure. As you are actively looking at and fixing up the rproxy branch I
am actively keeping it up to date wrt HEAD. A bonus you get from
caring to look at the code.
> If there's something useful I can do to help with this, I am happy
> to do so. Fixing this problem for real would dramatically reduce
> my memory usage.
The first step involves trying to repeat the problem under controlled
conditions. Doing debugging on a live system is damn hard..
> I'm clueless as far as the code flow for squid when it is handling
> large numbers of partial requests on a single large object. Where
> do I start?
Lets first try to repeat the problem, so we know in detail what
triggers it and when.
Regards
Henrik
Received on Fri Jun 21 2002 - 16:27:06 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:15:41 MST