Jeffrey D. Wheelhouse wrote:
> Great! Did you apply the patch I sent? The existing rproxy code causes
> segfaults later on.
Not yet. I do have other tasks in my life than Squid requiring attention.. but
it is sitting in my queue still.
> "A temporary pointer to the referenced data (if valid) is returned in
> the &pointer argument." That's the "breakthrough" line for me. Before,
> I ended up looking at the code to figure out that "pointer" was an
> output parameter. Maybe that's because I'm used to a different set of
> conventions, but now it's very clear.
>
> Good update. I did read it several times, but that section was not
> "clicking" for me before.
Great. So there is no comments on what to improve now?
> Thanks Henrik, you have a lot of patience and it is appreciated.
Your help is highly appreciated. We acutely need more people looking at the
Squid code.
Regards
Henrik
Received on Wed Jun 19 2002 - 10:03:55 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:15:41 MST