RE: delay pools limitation

> The FAQ says:
>
> it is possible for one connection or a small number of connections
> to take all the bandwidth from a given bucket and the other
> connections to be starved completely, which can be a major
> problem if there are a number of large objects being transferred
> and the parameters are set in a way that a few large objects
> will cause all clients to be starved (potentially fixed by a
> currently experimental patch).
>
>
> Is that still true? Or was the patch incorporated?

The relevant patch was the random selection of the next file descriptor,
which was incorporated long ago.

BTW if you're updating the faq, I'm david@luyer.net not
luyer@ucs.uwa.edu.au;
I only get viruses and squid questions via luyer@ucs.uwa.edu.au now :-)

David.
Received on Wed Jun 05 2002 - 19:13:47 MDT