> Hello,
>
> We're seeing various problems with that release under load as well. It
> appears once the squid process grows to around 100MB (which at roughly
> 300 req/second is about an hour) it becomes useless, almost
> totally stops
> serving connections. Systems run 512MB ram.
Diffrent problems. My squid was 1.3Gb in size (1 Gb memcache) when
it died.
> I'm not really sure what the right combo of servers +
> hardware is gonna be
> to route 100mBit/sec of traffic through squid.
I'm using Alteon load balancers for load-balancing,
and cachedigests+icp for inter-cache communications,
NTLM authentication via SMB helper and extensive ACLs.
In conditions similar to my setup, I think that for that
kind of traffic you'd need 5 to 6 dual-proc 1GHz servers,
each with 2 instances of Squid running. 8-10 servers if
you want a single instance per server.
-- /kinkieReceived on Thu May 30 2002 - 01:57:23 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:15:31 MST