On Monday 20 May 2002 21:37, Guido Serassio wrote:
> A final question to Henrik: what is Your opinion about have a fs
> store module (COSS) developed with already native NT support
> built-in ?
I don't have much of an opinion. If it works and does not disturb
other parts when not compiled then I am fine.
What goes on within a fs/repl/helper is not my concern unless I need
to use named fs/repl/helper.
If you find that there might be problems maintaining a single
codebase of "COSS" for both UNIX and NT, then I recommend to split it
in two, or at least separate source files within the store
implementation for the UNIX/NT dependent parts.
Regards
Henrik
Received on Mon May 20 2002 - 18:22:40 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:15:29 MST