Re:Re: Campare the callback mechanism of Squid is with normal callback mechanism

From: <maer727@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 10:55:41 +0800 (CST)

Thanks, Henrik pal!

Sorry for my poor description. :-)

I think in normal implementions of callback, the problem "caller
freed it's data while callback is pending" is not considered, but Squid
considered the problem. Am I correct?

Best regards,
George Ma

----- Original Message -----
From: Henrik Nordstrom
To: maer727@sohu.com
Cc: squid-dev@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: Campare the callback mechanism of Squid is with normal callback
 mechanism
Sent: Tue Apr 23 16:07:27 CST 2002

> maer727@sohu.com wrote:
>
> > But I still find the information about the comparison with
> > the callback mechanism of Squid is with normal callback mechanism
> > is not enough.
>
> It is a normal callback mechanism, except for the use of cbdata to
> protect from the problem "caller freed it's data while callback is
> pending".
>
> > I just what to find why Squid is prior to other mechanism in
> > details. What is the short coming of the other mechanism in detail?
>
> ???
>
> Regards
> Henrik
Received on Tue Apr 23 2002 - 20:55:41 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:15:19 MST