RE: commSetTimeout and cbdata

From: Chemolli Francesco (USI) <ChemolliF@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 10:42:58 +0200

> > Maybe this should be fixed in 2.5 as well. Unfortunately the cbdata
> > branch is a bit too intrusive for 2.5 at this time I think..
>
> This may be the leak in NTLM I was referring to a while back - kinkie
> had a _lot_ of unfreed connection structs. If we can fix it
> in 2/5, that
> would be great.

Please please do.

This is a showstopper for heavy NTLM deployment IMO.
As it is now, I'm leaking about 3Mb/hour (with 150
to 200 hits/second peak). 

-- 
	/kinkie
Received on Tue Apr 09 2002 - 02:44:53 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:14:59 MST