On Thu, Apr 04, 2002, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> > I'm enforcing the latter, and I'm hoping the former is done (or you won't
> > parse the headers, right? :)
>
> Yes.
>
> What?
What were you after exactly?
> > The offset is only there as a "check" to make sure the rest of the store
> > client api users requrest data sequentially - and you'd be surprised how
> > many strange places that wasn't true.
>
> I know quite many strange places who was depending on the ability to re-read
> data..
Well, now they have to keep the data that they want to reuse.
> > Eventually it will disappear. Instead, when you go storeLookup() you'll
> > ask for a specific range of data (or -1, -1 for everything I guess)
> > to grab the range data.
>
> One range per storeLookup(), or a list of ranges?
I don't know. Pick one. :)
If its a list of ranges then the object can be returned atomically - if
its one per storeLookup() the code is simpler, but you risk the possibility
of the object changing between calls to StoreLookup() and having the returned
data not piece together
Adrian
Received on Thu Apr 04 2002 - 18:22:47 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:14:58 MST