On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 April 2002 00:16, Andres Kroonmaa wrote:
>
> > > http://devel.squid-cache.org/projects.html#cf_preprocess
> >
> > Cute. case closed?
>
> I don't know. It is just one small proposal on how to deal with it.
>
> Which one do you prefer for your use?
>
> a) Simple include capability in Squid
>
> b) Simple integration any pre-processor to deal with includes and
> potentioally other complex problems, but at the cost of less precise
> error handling as the two isn't integrated.
add to (b): inability to share configs with #includes without sharing
(and, essentially, requiring) a given "any pre-processor"
See my previous post on why such sharing and related activities is the
primary reason to have an internal preprocessor, IMO.
Alex.
Received on Tue Apr 02 2002 - 15:46:27 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:14:56 MST