Re: breaking -HEAD

I am not very happy with intentionally breaking features HEAD.

Should also note that there is a huge backlog of mostly tested
features waiting to get committed to HEAD.

Regards
Henrik

On Tuesday 12 February 2002 06.46, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The last module left to convert is the cache digests code - but
> I've been playing around with it for the last week or two and..
> well.. I'm not really happy with it holding back my progress.
>
> I'd like to commit the commloops code to HEAD so it can be tested -
> with an #error if the cache digests code is compiled in.
>
> I _will_ revisit this before squid-HEAD becomes stable - I think
> that its worth leaving broken whilst the changes are tested by a
> (hopefully) slightly larger audience.
>
> I would like to move ahead with the next stage of commloops work,
> which is verification that I've actually turned the
> storeClientCopy() API into a proper stream (through assert()ions)
> and then working on reworking the transient object cache handling.
>
> Does anyone mind if I do this?
>
>
>
>
> Adrian
Received on Tue Feb 12 2002 - 04:40:07 MST