On Sun, Oct 21, 2001, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Sun, 2001-10-21 at 19:57, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> > Guido: The patch contains several segments specific to a native windows
> > port not using cygwin.
> >
> > I am not very fond of messing up the code with various native windows
> > port stuff until such a port is complete, and the native port of 2.5 is
> > far from complete isn't it?
>
> IMO Guido forward porting bit by bit in clean sections makes a lot of
> sense. We get a lot more time to say 'this bit is unclean' and 'that bit
> is good'. Say for example the getrusage stuff. So I'm for bringing in
> the WIN32 stuff incrementally. Anything major - such as directly using
> WinSock calls or implementing overlapped I/O - can then be evaluated on
> it's merits, without all the trivial stuff being mixed into the same
> patch.
Unless he's done all of the work to remove deferred reads without just
reading at full speed from the server, you'll need to wait for
the commloops code to finish before this can be done.
Adrian
Received on Sun Oct 21 2001 - 05:17:10 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:14:34 MST