Sounds good to me. I know of a couple of minor fixes in the ntlm branch,
but nothing major - and they can be applied to both HEAD and 2.5. I'll
also up the heat on the automake list if I don't hear from Tom this
week.
Rob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Henrik Nordstrom" <hno@marasystems.com>
To: <squid-dev@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 7:26 PM
Subject: Squid-2.5
> Hi fellow Squid hackers.
>
> I propose we branch Squid-2.5 real soon now and make a official
> PRE-STABLE release, or is there any known issues that must be
addressed
> first?
>
> During the last months the activity in Squid-2.5 has mostly been bug
> fixes and small cleanups. I don't think we will gain much in
continuing
> doing this much longer. The code is the way it is, and until it
receives
> a broader testing I don't think many new problems will be discovered.
>
> Sure, there is some of a backlog of known problems registered in
> Bugzilla for both HEAD and Squid-2.4. Any help in trying to clean some
> of those up is highly appreciated. There is today a total of 82 open
> bugzilla entries.
>
>
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=AS
SIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED
>
> Regards
> Henrik
>
Received on Tue Oct 02 2001 - 03:28:24 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:14:23 MST