Re: aio_read implementaion in Squid

Hello Adrian & Henrik,

Thanks for your valuable points. Actually I wanted to start that before 2
weeks itself. But As I was busy with other works, I could not make it. Again
I am stressing you all that I am for very very very High performance Squid.
say It should handle 1k req/sec. I am not really for very quicker solution.
So Pls guide me in this way.

So my objective will be,
* If you want to finish eventio model first, Ie for moderate performance
improvement, I can try to contribute from my side.
* But Before doing that, I should get fair decision of what I/O will be good
for Squid in all aspects to achieve 1k req/sec.
I know filesystem also another big bottleneck. Assume now, FileSystem is not
bottleneck and tell me How much My squid can handle and with which Net I/O
Implementation?

Regards,
Venkatesh

> On Thu, Sep 13, 2001, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> > Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >
> > > > Have now updated eventio to HEAD (and automake). It compiles, but I
> > > > strongly doubt it is at all usable. The code was left in the middle
of a
> > > > farily large transition from the old "polled" I/O model to the
"eventio"
> > > > I/O model.
> > >
> > > Did you have any ideas on how this could be done relatively easily?
> >
> > Not really. At the stage eventio branch currently is the easiest path is
> > most likely to "just" finish the transition.
> >
> > If one starts over doing it at a slower pace then I have some ideas on
> > how the old I/O model could be implemented using the new core, including
> > deferred reads. But it is unclear if this will be any easier.
>
> Well, throw me the ideas? :)
>
>
>
> Adrian
>

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Received on Thu Sep 13 2001 - 06:19:16 MDT