Re: NT port

Robert Collins wrote:

> I'll check from home what version I've got. I was thinking of creating a
> diff to 2.3stable4 (which is what his code is based on), and then
> branching off of 2.3stable4, apply the diff, then cvsmergeinit to HEAD.
>
> But I'm happy to leave it to you :]

Done, and attempted to bring it up do date with Squid-2.4. HEAD will
follow once the Squid-2.4 port is verified.

Yes, there design issues in the port which is questionable, so for the
HEAD port I'd like to see if there is a more clean cut way to aceive the
same thing.

Adrian: What is the state of commloops? As you said the NT port might
benefit from that.

/Henrik
Received on Sat Jan 06 2001 - 17:04:46 MST