Re: transfer-encoding

----- Original Message -----
From: "Henrik Nordstrom" <hno@hem.passagen.se>
To: "Robert Collins" <robert.collins@itdomain.com.au>
Cc: <squid-dev@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2001 6:57 AM
Subject: Re: transfer-encoding

> Robert Collins wrote:
>
> > Once it's stable sure. If NTLM goes into head I have 0 objections to
> > merging it into auth_rewrite and leaving the separate ntlm branch for
> > experimentation (cf example domain membership based challenge
> > generation).
>
> They will go in together, unless you have changes in the general
> framework in ntlm which you still consider higly experimental.

The ntlm patch contains no changes to the auth framework (now).

>
> > The same logic applies. Yes I am happy to merge both the ntlm and
> > auth_digest branches up a level, leaving the old tags for experimental
> > work. My reference before about the ntlm tag was that IMO it is still
> > experimental.
>
> The question I need to have answered is the one above. Does the ntlm tag
> contain other changes which are experimental, or is it only in the NTLM
> specific parts?
>
> I.e. If the ntlm patch is committed, will there be any of what you
> consider experimental code even if you select not to build ntlm support
> in Squid?

No.

>
> > For sure. I do find having to run a separate source tree to get
> > ntlm+digest a little annoying :]
>
> Which is what I'd like to get rid of (;
>
> /Henrik
>
>

Rob
Received on Fri Jan 05 2001 - 15:46:52 MST