swap.state and database engines

From: Robert Collins <robert.collins@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 10:40:06 +1100

Has anyone looked into using a database engine (ie sleepycat db 3..) to manage the in-memory swap.state (with a huge in-memory
cache)? Too hard/not worth it/tried and it blew chunks?

I ask because the huge overhead of memory for the swap.state would be (potentially) much allieviated if it could be run off-disk.

Thoughts?

Rob
Received on Tue Dec 12 2000 - 16:31:23 MST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Robert Collins: "Re: Storing partial responses"
Previous message: Adrian Chadd: "Re: Storing partial responses"
Next in thread: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: swap.state and database engines"
Reply: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: swap.state and database engines"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:13:03 MST