Re: Store I/O round 2

On Sun, Sep 17, 2000, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> >
> > Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >
> > > Do you forsee any problems in simply making *all* store clients DISK clients,
> > > bypassing the need for the whole transit cache thing?
> >
> > Yes. Not all objects are on disk, or even wanted there.
> >
> > The MemObject is a generic transit object used for all kinds of
> > requests, not those that are cached.
>
> ..., not ONLY those that are cached.
>
>
> I been skipping lots of those small words lately.. probably need to
> sleep some more ;-)

*laugh*

I was thinking more that the "specialised" happenings (staright 1:1
non-cacheable replies, error pages, cache digests, cache manager, etc)
could hide away as another 'file system' which basically acted as a
transit RAM cache only.

Guess I've been playing with VFS too long.

Continue brain-dumping storage manager wishlists here..

Adrian

-- 
Adrian Chadd			"If a butterfly flaps its wings in China,
<adrian@creative.net.au>	    will a women get naked in Amsterdam?"
				      -- Ashley Penney on Chaos Theory