Re: simplifying things like delay pools

Sounds good - as long as there's no collision with the ssl overloads...

Rob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Adrian Chadd" <adrian@creative.net.au>
To: <squid-dev@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2000 3:50 PM
Subject: simplifying things like delay pools

>
> Benno's SSL patchset does an interesting thing - it overloads the socket
> read() and write() into a per-FD function pointer pair, so SSL connections
> don't need evil if (ssl) { } else { } wrapped around them.
>
> I was thinking that this also might be good for delay pools - instead of
> having all the delay pool ifdefs floating around read()s you could just
> overload read() and then stick the delay pool magic in there.
>
> What do people think ?
>
>
>
> Adrian
>
> --
> Adrian Chadd "If a butterfly flaps its wings in China,
> <adrian@creative.net.au> will a women get naked in Amsterdam?"
> -- Ashley Penney on Chaos Theory
>
Received on Sat Sep 16 2000 - 00:32:04 MDT