Alex Rousskov wrote:
> > This also reminds me of the old issue of refresh patterns, in-memory
> > timestams and cache digest. In my opinion only one object timestamp
> > needs to be kept in memory: when the object needs to be refreshed next.
Correction: Two timestamps are needed.
1. corrected "date" value, used as a base for Age.
2. freshness lifetime, preferably expressed as a lifetime and not
expiration date.
/Henrik
Received on Tue Jul 29 2003 - 13:15:58 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:12:08 MST